Visualizzazione post con etichetta speak english. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta speak english. Mostra tutti i post

domenica 15 novembre 2009

Boom.



The post-war economic expansion, also known as the "long boom" and the "Golden Age of Capitalism", was an international period of economic prosperity in the mid 20th century which followed the end of World War II in 1945, and lasted until the early 1970s, ending with the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, the 1973 oil crisis, and the 1973–1974 stock market crash. Historians are divided on periodizing that unrepeatable stage, which varied from country to country, continent to continent. But there's one thing you cannot discuss: the "boom" began after the bloodiest war in history, when the West was in ashes, and finished when the old welfare had been reprised and far exceeded. Europe and Western world would never again reach a time like that.
It is no coincidence if ever in that twenty years (or thirty years) you reached the maximum rate of fertility that the West and the world have never crossed. In both the human field, with more than 77 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964, and the artistic field, where popular culture lived an unrivalled season of creativity.
With a simplistic equation, you can support that fertility has always been parallel to happiness. And is an equation that takes an almost physical significance, even where development and the boom took place, albeit marginally: it was in the unforgettable reportages of Kapuscinski, where a recently de-colonialized Africa was packed out by consumables - Mirinda soft drinks, primitive tv ads, funny cars - and still colourful, chaotic, in turmoil. Happy.
The same artistic and demographic explosion have been lived by all peoples just leaving some sort of long and grey dictatorship, as the "Asian tigers". Or those giants for years exploited by the colonial powers and now risen again, even though with a thousand legacies of misery, as the Indian subcontinent, Brazil, Iran, Indonesia. And let us not forget the two-Germany of 1989: the Trabant car getting the wheels for the first time on the capitalist ground; the assaults to supermarkets: old fashion shows that are concrete signs of change. Something that an aged, replete and asleep country as Italy cannot understand. In The Millionaire (2008) film, the Bombay misérables followed the television deeds of their hero through the screen shared in an overcrowded shack, in the same fashion of the Roman and Milanese suburbs of the 1950s. Happiness is the physical sense of consumption, the overabundance, the landscape of cranes (like in Dubai or China). The feeling to be a rampant and young community.
Of that special fertility, many years after, feels a harrowing lack. Aside from wars and massacres nothing really new happened, and nothing really new seems to expect us at the gate. The major demographic, economic and cultural expansion seems to happen elsewhere and to the capitals of the old empires remains the training of their executives leaders. This great stagnation is as theft of hope. A future equal to the present may be sufficient for the elderly, may even reassure them. But is physiologically hostile to young people: it breaks the equation between happiness and fertility. Our only hope is to live at least a couple of boom, who knows where and who knows how. There are walls to tear down. They're often invisible.

sabato 14 novembre 2009

Molecular.



HERE is the european post-industrial economy: millions of small entrepreneurs, professionals, millions of self-employed, millions of submerged workers. If the most important revolution from 1950 to 1975 consisted in the disappearance of peasants, the engine of change in the past thirty years had established in labour and society through a huge dose of individual subjectivity. This radically new structure has broken the distinctions of class and social cohesion; places of convergence and solidarity of interests exist no more, replaced by a huge molecular middle class. Each individual looks only for the path of achievement and mobility.
The collective psychology today focuses on the desire of consumption, free time, construction in its own future, then focuses its commitment towards immediate gain, in making money by money. It is necessary to give a moral judgement on this new reality, which is not a national, nor continental, but a worldwide standard? No, and it would be more then stupid: it would be useless. Facts are facts and figures are figures. They explain the social malaise, solitary mass neurosis, abandonment and indeed the refusal of the politics, the indifference towards growing issues of legality, the fall of solidarity. But also, as a positive side, the discovery of the risk as the value. You also explain the effectiveness of demagogy and plebiscitarism over a moltutude of individualities dispersed into a lonely crowd. This kind of society is therefore physiologically oriented towards the Berlusconian-right.
In a molecular society the most nagging problem is to rebuild the civilisation in a humanist sense: not as a dictatorial idea of Good, understood as ideology and redemption, but rather as the goodness culture and as a concrete and individual experience. And, at the same time, with patience and humility, to keep contacts with the community, with other molecules: for a policy of innovation, efficiency, new enthusiasm, new securities, new solidarity, new rights and new duties. The problem is to have cold blood and warm heart. And feeling like fighting. Fighting involves risk, but is this not the society of risks?

domenica 26 luglio 2009

se lo dice lui...

Forse è proprio il momento di trasferirci tutti in Iran...